Importantly, the current relationships between risk and the USD appear to be broadly linked to the perceived virtue of the USD as liquid and safe and as a barometer of possible ‘excess returns’, both positive and negative, in a climate of
renewed favourable economic activity. It has generally been a very successful trading strategy to take positions in the USD based on risk.
There is also the case that what happens in the US is critically important for the rest of the world and market. This may seem obvious with the US still accounting for more than one-fifth of world GDP, but when the US slid into the deep recession, it meant the prospects for the rest of the world deteriorated. There was no decoupling here, just a lag. Because of the dominance of the US in the world economy and markets, the trade was to sell other currencies as their economies were dragged into the mired generated by the US economic misery. The opposite is true too that in a climate of, for example, an unexpectedly powerful recovery in the US, “buy the rest of the world” will be valid as the dynamism of a strong US lifts the rest of the world with it.
This story can only go so far. If the US has genuinely great fundamentals at some stage, the USD should and will appreciate. Think of the US with strong growth, fiscal surpluses and high real yields. While the world would also be strong, these dynamics would surely favour a stronger USD and we only need to look back at the second half of the 1990s to see strong growth, high yields and fiscal surpluses for an example where fundamentals do work – as mentioned, this was a period of unrelenting USD strength.
But let’s have a look at the past 12 months or so. The fall in the USD since the worst of the global crisis has passed may actually be masking something else – the economic fundamentals of the US economy and its currency might just actually demand a lower USD! It may have little to do with risk appetite. If so, this may show that the market mantra about trading the USD on the back of changes in risk aversion may be at least a little misguided.
Last edited by LFX; 11-05-2009 at 05:53 PM.
|